Direktlänk till inlägg 19 augusti 2012
Assange is facing allegations of sexual assault/rape and this case has now became world politics.
A lot of people has opinions of what took place between Assange och and the two women in a private area.
And not only that.
Signs out crying that this is a honey trap is passing by on TV, and a lot of men are expressing their wieve that these women are not reliable. They are lying, they hate men, they are this and that.
But this kind of wievers have one thing in common: they don´t blame the man.
So therefore we can assume that men can be trapped.
That THEY DON´T CHOOSE. They go in a trap and they are stucked there.
When it boils down to is a question of their dick, men can´t choose for themselves. Their dicks do.
But we have not only the word honey trap which indicates this disturbing reality.
We have the word gold-diggers - women are gold-diggers and they exploit men. Men (which by the way often are the wealthier ones in the world – what a coincidence!) are NOT BEING ABLE TO CHOOSE for themselves when it comes down to their own money. Women are.
We have the word hookers, which mean that someone hooked a man. The man DOESN´T CHOOSE for himself. The dick leads him and he gets hooked. Much like in the case of a honey trap. (To even more explain for other man what had happened, the word Happy hooker is invented. Not only is the man hooked - he is even “happy hooked”.)
And then it becomes serious politics. Politics in one country and politics involving several countries.
BIG deal in other words.
Let´s look at other examples.
The DSK affair in New York, when he sexually harassed a cleaning lady, became an affair in France.
His political companions claimed that this was a setup. The powerful man COULD NOT CHOOSE, his dick did.
(And now he is in charge of even more serious sexual related crimes so what´s the political deal this time? )
When Swedish high politicians was involved in a prostitution-ring, even with minors, in the 70tis, they claimed it was all false and a bunch of lies. But now we know that if the truth had come out, the government would have been seriously wounded and the fore coming election would have crushed.
The high politicians protected each other and put their dicks needs BEFORE the lead of the country.
In the year 2010 was another dick-case like this, which was even more made a high-class-secret.
The New York governor Spitzer, who spoke out in public against trafficking and prostitution, secretly bought women, and his defence was that he claimed that he was in a stressful situation. It WASN´T really HIS FAULT, his stress all went down to his dick.
Surprisingly often this is the defence of the man in this kind of situation, the man was stressed, had a lot of pressure, had problems with his wife (clearly not the opposite...), didn´t understand that he was visiting a strip club, thought the woman liked his attack or his harassment, he was just being polite, he was doing what he thought the woman wanted. And so on. There is no limit for a man`s fantasy when it comes to explain why he was led by his dick.
There are numerous examples where high politicians and opinion leaders have committed sexual related crimes, and where this dick-related action then turns into something which involves high level political actions. It even troubles the relationships between countries which this Assange-case is a good example of.
This is serious; there is no doubt about it!
If men can´t control their dick, if they are out of action and rational thinking because of it, should they ever be considered to have ANY control at all?
Or to rephrase it:
If they can´t take responsibility for they behaviour, when their dick controls them, can they ever take ANY responsibility in ANY given time for anything?
And when is that ”any given time” and what is ”anything”?
Is there reason to believe that any of that exists?
So the important questions to ask are:
Should men be allowed to lead the world at all if they are not in charge of their actions?
Should countries relationships and a fore coming hostility between nations be at stake because of ONE man’s dick?
Should men even be declared to be incapable to managing their own affairs - should they even vote?
If men especially powerful men, can´t control themselves and if their actions 24/7 is guided by their dick, this is the relevant questions to be highlighted as a consequence of this Assange case:
If men have this urge to stick their dicks in people everywhere and not having A CHOICE OF THEIR OWN, have can anyone think that they are capable of taking care of their own citizen responsibilities?
Like we are supposed to do when we vote?
Dan, if you can´t help yourself from writing things about the women in the Assange-case: how do you think your comment will be published here? And you missing the point. The man has a choice. He has always a choice.
But I am not surprised that you like to blame the female part, that´s your " natural" bias.
Which exactly was the point.
Även i år beslutade länstyrerelserna om licensjakt på varg utan någon egentligt grundlig analys och reflektion om varför. Överklagande av naturorganisationer till högsta juridiska instans ledde inte till någon förändring trots att domstolar int...
Idag nås vi av nyheten att Ecuadors ambassad tillåter att Assange förhörs om våldtäktsmisstankarna som funnits sedan 2010. Men varför glömmer media bort vad som har hänt under dessa år? Hur Assange har utryckt sig? Hur en åklagare som inte ens...
Idag är det fem år sedan Anders Behring Breivik utförde sina välplanerade och fruktansvärda terrordåd. Trots att det är en händelse som omtalats mycket i både Norge och Sverige så tycks den kontext som Breivik verkade i, inte ha analyseras. Han...
Den fasansfulla historien om lejonhannen Cecils död i Zimbabwe rullar nu över världen. Han sköts med pilbåge och föst efter 40 TIMMAR efterföljande sköts han ihäl med skjutvapen. Ett mer utstuderat djurplågeri är svårt att föreställa sig. Den nöjes...
Tänkte faktiskt försöka blogga lite i sommar men jag tänkte börja med en att reprisera ett tidigare inlägg och förändra det lite - från att handla om SD till att handla om SD-anhängare. Det är precis lika aktuellt idag som när det publicerades mars 2...